SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

N.K.GUPTA
Mahipal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar – Respondent


ORDER :

N.K. Gupta, J.

The applicant has preferred this present revision against the order dated 30.11.1988 passed by the Additional Judge to Additional Sessions Judge, Burhanpur in Criminal Revision No. 129 of 1997 whereby it was directed that delay in filing the criminal complaint was condoned and the learned JMFC, Burhanpur was directed to proceed with the case. The facts of the case in short are that the respondent no. 1/complainant has lodged a complaint against the applicant on the ground that a cheque issued by the applicant was dishonored on 21.5.1994. Thereafter, a notice of demand was given on 28.5.1994 which was received by the applicant on 2.6.1994 but, no payment was made therefore, cause of action arose to the complainant on 17.6.1994 and he was entitled to file a complaint up to 16.7.1994. He filed the complaint with delay of 5-6 days because he was suffering from amoebic colitis within the period 15.7.1994 to 21.7.1994. He had also moved an application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act. The trial Court registered the complainant vide order dated 24.1.1995 but, thereafter an enquiry took place for the application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act and vide order dated 24.7.1997 the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top