SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Ashish Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shri. Ashish Trivedi, learned counsel
For the Respondent: Shri. Amit Pandey, learned G.A.

ORDER :

These two petitions arise out from the same Crime No. 141/18 registered at Police Station Chandera District Teekamgarh. Petitioner has been filed these miscellaneous criminal case under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. being aggrieved with criminal proceeding in the offence under Sections 109, 379 of IPC and Section 53 of M.P. Minor Mineral Rules, 1996 vide Crime No. 141/2018 registered at Police State Chandera District Teekamgarh. Looking to this fact that the similar issues are involved in these petition, therefore, this Court shall decide the same through passing a common order.

2. Facts of the case in short are that petitioner-accused Sanad Kumar is registered owner of vehicle (Dumper) No. UP93 AT 9349. Petitioner-accused Ashish Singh is the owner of vehicle (Dumper) No. UP 93 AT 9239 and UP 93 AT 7654. At the time of incident, Sub Inspector- Pradeep Saraf was posted at police station, Chandera. On 05.08.2018 in the night, he was searching the vehicle. At the time of checking four dumpers No. UP 93 AT 9349, UP 93 AT 9239, UP 93 AT 7654 and UP 93 BT 6129 were stopped, in which s



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top