SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.K.GANGELE
Officer In Charge – Appellant
Versus
Ram Bai – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sanjay Dwivedi
For the Respondent:Uttam Maheshwari, Advocates

ORDER :

S.K. Gangele, J.

The petitioner has filed this petitioner against the award dated 04.07.2014 by which the labour court has awarded a compensation of Rs. 1 lac in lieu of reinstatement after holding that the termination of the respondent was in violation of Section 25-F of the Industrial Dispute Act 1947 (in short "the Act of 1947"). The petition is listed on an application filed by the respondent in regard to non compliance of Section 17 of the Act of 1947 and some of the petitions are listed on admission. The court has issued notices on admission. Looking to the nature of the dispute with the consent of the parties, the petition is heard on admission. The appropriate Government vide order dated 14.7.2005 in exercise of powers under Section 10(1) of the I.D. Act 1947 referred the dispute to the labour court for adjudication that whether the termination of service of respondent, Smt. Ram Bai was proper or not and what relief she was entitled for.

2. Before the Labour Court the respondent pleaded that she was engaged as labour in the year of 1974 and her services were terminated in the year of 1992 without payment of any retrenchment compensation by an oral order. Before termina











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top