SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 177

VISHAL MISHRA
Dharam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Deenanath – Respondent


Advocates:
N. K. Gupta with S. D. Singh, Advocate for appellants;
Yogesh Singhal for respondents.

ORDER

1. The present Misc. Appeal under Order 43 rule 1 (u) of Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 12.5.2010 passed by IV Additional District Judge, Bhind in Civil Appeal No. 47/2009 and 48/2009 whereby allowing the appeal order of remand has been passed.

2. The plaintiffs respondents No. 1 to 4 herein have filed a civil suit for declaration and permanent injunction and also for closing the door on the land araji No. 202 and for possession of the garbage center. It is being pleaded that the suit property was purchased by registered sale deed dated 20.6.1984 by defendants No. 3 and 4 and thereafter, family settlement has taken place, on the basis of which, they are in possession. It is alleged that they are in possession in disputed property, as after settlement of property share, the same has been marked in the map as Ka, Kha, Sa, Da. It is also argued that the adjacent land is being used by defendants No. 1 and 2 and they are throughing their garbage on the aforesaid land. It is further alleged that the land is being encroached by the defendants No.1 and 2. The pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top