SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 192

VIRENDER SINGH
Shankarlal @ Bhawanishankar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Praveen Porwal for appellants; R.K. Pathak, Public Prosecutor for respondents/State.

JUDGMENT

1. The appellants have preferred this appeal against judgment and order dated 20.1.2017 passed in Sessions Trial No. 191 of 2008 by Special Judge SC/ST Act, Ratlam whereby the learned trial Court has held both the appellants guilty for the offence punishable under section 307 read with 34 of IPC and awarded 5-5 years R.I. respectively and fine of Rs. 1,500/- Rs. 1,500/- to each of them with default stipulations.

2. The prosecution case is that on 15.8.2018, the appellants, who are neighbours of the complainant, along with other co-accused persons-Kamla Bai and Parwati Bai, who have been acquitted by the learned trial Court, were spreading 'Murram' on the backside of the house of the complainant and when they objected for the same, they assaulted them. Badarilal caused injuries to Ram Narayan and his son Bharatlal by axe. Ram Narayan lodged Dehati Nalshi. On medical examination, certain injuries were found, which in the opinion of the Doctor, were dangerous to the life. The police registered FIR No. 195 of 2008 and after usual investigation filed the charge-sheet.

3. The appellants are charged under sections 307 read with section 34 of IPC, they absurd their guilt and claime

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top