SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 302

G.S.AHLUWALIA
Anand Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
K. N. Gupta with R. S. Dhakad for appellants; O. P. Saxena and D. K. Shrivastava for respondents No. 2 to 4.

JUDGMENT

1. This second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 30.8.1997 passed by 3rd Additional District Judge, Vidisha in Civil Appeal No. 82-A of 1994, thereby setting aside the judgment and decree passed by Civil Judge, Class 1, Kurwai, Distt. Vidisha in Civil Suit No. 4-A/1984.

2. The original Plaintiff Gopal Rao, who died during the pendency of the civil suit and was substituted by his legal representatives, had filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction which was decreed by the trial Court and it was held that the plaintiff is the owner and in possession of the land in dispute and permanent injunction was issued against the defendants No. 1 to 3/respondents No. 2 to 4.

3. The necessary facts for disposal of the present appeal in short are that the original Plaintiff Gopal Rao, filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction. Original Plaintiff Gopal Rao expired during the pendency of the civil suit and accordingly, the appellants were brought on record being the legal representatives of Original Plaintiff Gopal Rao. It is the case of the plaintiffs/appellants that Narayan Rao, father of original plaintiff Gopal Rao, was t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top