SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 335

S.K.AWASTHI
Rohit – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Gaurav Panchal for applicants; Rajesh Jain, Panel Lawyer for respondents No. 1/Sate, N. L. Tiwari for respondent No. 2.

ORDER

1. Since present matters are connected and arises out by the crime No. 18/2017 registered at police Station- Mahila Thana, Ratlam for the offence punishable under sections 498A, 323/34 of IPC. are being decided by the present common order.

2. The applicants/accused persons preferred MCrC No. 9360/2018 for quashment of FIR bearing crime No. 18/2017 registered at Police Station- Mahila Than, Ratlam and all consequential proceedings which has been registered in furtherance to the said FIR.

3. The applicants preferred MCrCNo. 2431/2019 under section 482 of CrPC challenging the order dated 22.9.2018 passed by Sessions Judge,Ratlam in Criminal Revision No. 87/2018 whereby the order dated 17.7.2018 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ratlam in criminal case No. 2215/2017 has been affirmed by which charge under section 498A, 323/34 of IPC. has been framed against the applicants.

4. The facts leading to filing of instant applications are that marriage was solemnized between the applicant No. 1 and respondent No. 2 (MCrC No. 9360/2018) on 20.2.2017. According to the complaint made by respondent No. 2, the present applicants were harassing her since the date of marriage for deman

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top