ORDER :

This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against the order dated 6-12-2017 passed by the Civil Judge, Class-I, Bhander, District Datia in Civil Suit No. 29A/2014.

2. Before considering the facts of the case, this Court feels it appropriate to consider certain incidents, which have taken place in the Court at the time of argument of this case.

3. In the first half of the day when the case was called, the associate counsel of the counsel for respondent No. 1 prayed for time to argue the matter. Since this petition is pending from 2017 and the further proceedings of the civil suit have been stayed, therefore, this Court refused to adjourn the matter and at the request of the counsel for respondent No. 1, the matter was passed over. At 2:30 PM when the case was taken up, Shri Pratip Visoriya, counsel for respondent No. 1, appeared and started his arguments by saying that “in the first half of the day his junior had prayed for adjournment and since this Court has refused to adjourn the matter, therefore, under compulsion he has come to argue the matter”. The submission made by the counsel for respondent No. 1 was not to the good taste, however, th