SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 436

G.S.AHLUWALIA
Jitendra Singh Kaurav – Appellant
Versus
Rajkumari Kaurav – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Prashant Sharma
For the Respondent: Anurag Saxena

ORDER :

1. Shri Prashant Sharma, counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Anurag Saxena, counsel for the respondent.

2. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against the order dated 17-11-2017 (Annexure P1) passed by Additional District Judge, Lahar, District Bhind in Case No. 249-A/2014 (HMA), by which the application filed by the petitioner for conducting the DNA Test of the petitioner with that of the child delivered by the respondent, has been rejected.

3. The necessary facts for the disposal of the present petition in short are that the petitioner has filed an application for grant of divorce under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act on various grounds. It appears that the reconciliation proceedings were taken up on 7-9-2015. On the said date, both the parties were present before the Court. After the conciliation proceedings, the petitioner agreed to take the respondent with him on the same day only, whereas the respondent submitted that that she is pregnant and the petitioner is alleging that the child does not belong to him and, therefore, she does not want to go with the petitioner. It is further mentioned in the order that thereafter, the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top