SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(MP) 959

MOHD FAHIM ANWAR
Sunil Kumar Kushvaha – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Pushpendra Kumar Verma
For the respondent: Santosh Yadav, Panel Lawyer

ORDER :

Shri Pushpendra Kumar Verma, learned counsel for the applicant. Shri Santosh Yadav learned Panel Lawyer for the respondent/State. Heard.

2. Case diary perused.

3. This is the first application under section 438, Criminal Procedure Code filed by the applicant for grant of anticipatory bail.

4. Applicant is apprehending his arrest in connection with Crime No. 78/2018 registered at Police Station Kusmi Distt. Sidhi for the offence under sections 302, 306 read with section 34 of Indian Penal Code.

5. The allegations against the applicant in short are that on 31-3-2018 the deceased was admitted to SGMH, Rewa with the history of burning, at that time she was found to be conscious. Her statement was recorded by the police officer. She died on the same day at about 11.40 pm. Information of which has been sent to police chowki, SGMH, Rewa, where the merg intimation number 0/2018 has been registered. During the course of the merg enquiry, statements of Vaishnavi @ Nandini daughter of deceased, aged about 8 years and other witnesses have been recorded. On that ground a Crime No. 74/18 for the offence under 306 of Indian Penal Code has been registered against the applicant and coaccused Akh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top