SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 552

S.K.AWASTHI
Juhi Chawla – Appellant
Versus
Gangandeep Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Shri Vishal Shrivastava for applicant; Ms. Poorva Mahajan for respondent.

ORDER

1. This criminal revision filed under section 397/401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 is directed against order dated 4.8.2019 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Indore in Criminal MJC No. 121/2017, in which the application filed by the respondent under section 125(5) of the CrPC read with section 127 of the CrPC has been allowed and earlier interim maintenance amount granted to the applicant to the tune of Rs. 15,000/- per month, vide order dated 7.12.2018 has been reduced to Rs. 7,500/- and subsequently Rs. 5,500/- per month.

2. The necessary facts for the disposal of the instant petition are that the applicant is a legally wedded wife of the respondent and she is residing separately with the respondent regarding which the allegation of the applicant is that the respondent was persistently making demand of dowry and ill treated her, therefore, she was forced to leave her matrimonial house. Then applicant has filed an application for grant of maintenance from the respondent under section 125 of the CrPC. The said application is still pending. During the pendency of the proceedings, the applicant filed an ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top