SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 4

ANAND PATHAK
Murarilal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
D.S. Tomar for appellant; Kshitiz Sharma, Public Prosecutor for respondent No. 1/State.

ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

2. The appellant has filed this appeal under section 14A (1) (2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the order dated 7.11.2019 passed by trial Court; whereby, application of appellant preferred under section 439 of CrPC has been rejected.

3. Appellant has been arrested on 19.7.2019 by Police Station Chachoda, District Guna in connection with Crime No. 129/2019 registered in relation to the offences punishable under sections 341, 294, 506, 353,186 and 34 of IPC and section 3 (1) (r) (s) and 3 (2) (va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

4. It is the submission of learned counsel for the appellant that false case has been registered against the appellant and he is suffering confinement since 19.7.2019. He referred the evidence of Patwari of concerned area -Eshwar Malviya (PW1), Revenue Inspector - Harveer Singh (PW5), Patwari-Alok (PW6), Patwari-Deepesh Mangal (PW7), Patwari-Raghuveer Singh Yadav (PW8), Patwari -Shiv Paratap Singh (PW9), Patwari -Bajrang Bahadur Singh (PW10) and Patari Arvind Mehta (PW11) and other witne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top