Back
VISHAL DHAGAT
Pranlal Shah – Appellant
Versus
M. P. Board of Revenue – Respondent
ORDER
1. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the order dated 2.11.2015 passed by the M.P. Board of Revenue, Gwalior. By the impugned order, Board of Revenue has considered the application filed under section 50 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code (hereinafter referred to as "MPLRC" for short) for revising the order passed in the second appeal.
2. The facts of the case in short are that one Shakar Ben Shah who is mother of respondent Nos.1 to 8 filed an application before the Tahsildar under section 178 of MPLRC for partition of the land between Heeralal Shah, Pranlal Shah, Shakar Ben Shah and Neeta Shah. Tahsildar passed an order dated 12.9.2005 and divided the land in question in four parts. The disputed Khasra Nos. were 42/1 measuring 1.246 hectare, 43/1 measuring 0.941 hectare, Khasra No. 45/1 measuring 0.099 total area 2.276 hectares. Learned Tahsildar vide its impugned order dated 12.9.2005 gave part of Khasra No. 42/1, 43/1 measuring 0.339 hectare to non-applicant No. 8 namely Neeta Shah. Tahsildar gave part of Khasra No. 42/1, 43/1 are 0.287 hectare, part of Khasra No. 45/1 measuring 0.640 hectare and part of Khasra No. 44/3 measuring 0.089 measurin
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
