SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 46

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Rohini Prasad Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Rohit Raghuvanshi for petitioner; S.P. Mishra, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. Since record of the ceiling case is available and learned counsel for the parties are ready to argue the matter, therefore, it is heard finally.

2. By the instant petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking following relief :

“(i) Set aside the order dated 16.3.2018 (Annexure P-2).

(ii) Record the name of the Petitioner in the Revenue Entries in relation to Old Khasra No. 95, New Khasra No. 23 of Area 0.49 Hectare and New Khasra No. 25 of Area 0.94 Hectare, Total Area : 1.43 Hectare situated at Mauja Chaukital, Tehsil and District Jabalpur (MP).

(iii) That, any other relief which is suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the Petitioner may also be granted in the interest of justice.

(iv) That, the cost of this petition may also be awarded to the Petitioner.”

3. Laconically, the facts leading to filing the instant petition are that the petitioner was bhoomi-swami of the agricultural land bearing old Khasra No. 95, new Khasra No. 23 of area 0.49 hectare and new Khasra No. 25 of area 0.94 hectare total area 1.43 hectare situated at Mauja Chaukital, Tahsil and District Jabalpur. As per the petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top