SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(MP) 606

ANAND PATHAK
Kastur Chand Jain (since dead) through LR Ashish Jain – Appellant
Versus
Keshri Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
D. D. Bansal for appellant.

JUDGMENT

1. Appellant/plaintiff filed this second appeal under section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 30.4.2009 passed by Second Additional District Judge, Vidisha in Civil Appeal No. 9-A/2008 affirming the judgment and decree dated 16.10.2007 passed by First Additional Civil Judge, Class-I, Vidisha in Civil Suit No. 197-A/2007.

2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that appellant/plaintiff (represented through LR) instituted a suit for eviction and arrears of rent on the grounds available under section 12 (1) of the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (for short "Act of 1961") against the defendant/respondent/tenant on the allegations that plaintiff is owner and possessor of a house situate at Chandrashekhar Marg, Ward No. 30, Vidisha and the defendant is his tenant in four rooms at ground floor on monthly rent of Rs. 250/-. It is alleged that defendant does not pay rent on time and not paid rent due against him since 1.4.2004 in spite of making demand and has paid rent up to 30.11.2004 after service of notice but did not pay the entire arrears of rent.

3. It is further alleged in the plaint that defendant constructed a house on a plot owned and possessed by him

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top