S.C.SHARMA, SHAILENDRA SHUKLA
Carewell Security Services Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Employees Provident Fund Organization – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.C. Sharma, J. - Regard being had to the similitude in the controversy involved in the present cases, these writ petitions were analogously heard and by a common order, they are being disposed of by this Court. Facts of the Writ Petition No.14287/2010 are narrated hereunder.
The petitioner before this Court has filed this present petition being aggrieved by the order dated 30.11.2010 passed by the Employee Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal in ATA No.372 (8)/10.
2. The facts of the case reveal that the petitioner is company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act and is engaged in the business of providing security guards to various establishment. A notice was issued by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Indore under the provision of Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred as the Act of 1952) directing the employer to deduct Provident Fund dues from the wages paid to the workman. In the notice, it was also observed that the wages shown by the employer are negligible and are even lesser to the wages prescribed under Minimum Wages Act. The notice was issued to ensure proper payment of Provident Fund dues paya
Higher Education vs. Provident Fund Commissioner
Kichha Sugar Company Limited through General Manager vs. Tarai Chini Mill Majdoor Union, Uttarakhand
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.