RAJENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Amit Kumar Pandey And Another – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh and Another. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Petitioners- accused have filed this M.Cr.C. under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceeding of criminal case no. 351/2019 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Satna in connection with crime No. 28/2019 for the offence punishable under Section 498-A, 294, 506 read with 34 and section 3/ 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
2. The prosecution case in nutshell is that marriage of respondent no. 2 was solemnized with petitioner-accused No. 1 on 29.05.2013. Petitioner-accused no. 2 is father-in-law of respondent no. 2. Respondent no. 2 submitted written report on 07.03.2019 before Police Station Mahila Thana Satna. It is mentioned in this report that petitioner-accused No. 1 is posted as Cashier Gramin Bank Satna. They are residing at Satna since 24.04.2014. They blessed one girl, her father-in-law petitioner no. 2 was also came there. Petitioners-accused demanded Rs. 10,00,000/- as dowry. They abused filthy language. They tortured and humiliated her. They told her that petitioneraccused no. 1 will solemnize another marriage because respondent no.2 is not beautiful and mentally retarded then she telephoned. Her parent was agreed to give Rs. 4,00,000/- but pet
Geeta Mehrotra and another vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another
Harshendra Kumar D. vs. Rehatilata Koley
Kans Raj vs. State of Punjab and others
Preeti Gupta & anothers vs. State of Jharkhand & another
Rakhi Mishra vs. State of Bihar and others
Sonu Gupta vs. Deepak Gupak Gupta and ors., (2015) 3 SCC 424
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.