MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Rajeev Kumar Dubey, J.
Vinay Choudhary - Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh - Respondent
MCRC-476-2020
Decided On : 11-02-2020
Bail Application - E-Tendering Manipulation - Information Technology Act, 2000, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Indian Penal Code - Section 120-B, 420, 468, 471, 66, 7 & 13(2) - Summary: The court discussed the manipulation of e-tendering system, involvement of accused in bid tampering, and the legal provisions under the Information Technology Act, Prevention of Corruption Act, and Indian Penal Code. The court found the accused's involvement in the manipulation based on evidence and rejected the bail application.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant was arrested for manipulation of e-tendering system involving offenses under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, Information Technology Act, and Prevention of Corruption Act. The manipulation led to illegal profits for certain companies.
Finding of the Court:
The court found evidence linking the applicant to the manipulation through user IDs, IP addresses, and mobile numbers. The court also noted financial transactions connecting the applicant to the manipulated bids.
Issues: The main issue was the involvement of the applicant in the e-tendering manipulation and whether there was sufficient evidence to establish his guilt.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the evidence of user IDs, IP addresses, and financial transactions to establish the applicant's involvement in the manipulation.
Final Decision: The court rejected the bail application based on the evidence presented and ongoing investigation into the applicant's involvement in the crime.
JUDGMENT
1. This is third bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail. Applicant Vinay Choudhary has been arrested on 10/04/2019 in connection with Crime No.12/2019 registered at Police Station, Economic Offences Wing (EOW), Bhopal (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Sections 120-B, 420, 468, 471 of the IPC and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Section 7 read with Section13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
2. The earlier bail applicants filed by the applicant were dismissed on merit by this Court vide orders dated 25/06/2019 & 27/09/2019 passed in M.Cr.C.No.19435/2019 & 38330/2019.
3. As per prosecution story, M.P. State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as is a body working under State of M.P. Department of Science and Technology. Department of Information Technology, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh adopted the e-Tendering System using online platform in 2006. In the year 2012 Government of Madhya Pradesh appointed MPSEDC, as the Nodal Agency for MP e-procurement portal. MPSEDC selected M/s Tata Consultancy Services with Antares Systems Ltd. as the new Implementation Agency for end-to-end e-Procurement solutions. The agreement with TCS & Antares was signed in the year 2013. The New Service Providers undertook the Customization, Integration, Implementation and Maintenance of Single, Unitary, Web Based e-Procurement Software (Portal) with the specified modules which also include E-Tendering. Co-accused Manohar M.N. was the Vice President of Antares Systems Ltd. and was the project in-charge on behalf of the company. Co-accused Nandkishor Brahme was posted as OSD in MPSEDC from the year 2012 and was assigned the duty as Nodal Officer of E-Tendering Project. In E-Tendering Project, MPSEDC made a platform available to various Government Departments for floating tenders. In the tendering processes the concerned Department which issued the tender uploaded its tender on the portal, on which last date of filing tender and the time of its opening was mentioned. While issuing the tender, the concerned officer also attached the public key of his digital signature. The tenderer after registering himself on MP e-Procurement portal filled the tender and after filing the tender, submitted the tender on the portal after it was encrypted by the public key of the officer concerned attached with the tender. After submission of the tender, no departmental officer, etendering company or other person could open the tender before its opening time.
4. On 11th April, 2018 at the time of opening of three tenders Nos.91, 93 & 94 floated by the Madhya Pradesh Jal Nigam Maryadit (here in after referred as the computer displayed a message that the contents of the document had been modified. On that service provider company Antares Systems Ltd. was directed to submit the report after inquiry. In the first report given by the team of Antares Systems Ltd after examining the system they mentioned that there was no irregularity and only attributed the message to technical defect. However, they also stated that further technical analysis was going on. Thereafter, on 05/05/2019 Antares Systems Ltd. again gave the Root Cause Analysis Report (R.C.A.) mentioning therein that the tenders had been tampered with. On that the then Managing Director of MPSIDC informed MPJNM for canceling these bids and also directed Antares Systems Ltd. to enquire all the tenders, which were floated by the various Government department between 01/01/2018 to 30/04/2018 on E-Portal. On that the team of employees of Antares Systems Ltd. again enquired the matter and gave the report to the effect that during the check period six other tenders i.e. tender of MP Road Development Corporation No.786, Public Works Department Tender Nos. 49813, 49982 & 49985 and tender of Water Resources Department Nos. 10030 & 10044 were also manipulated similarly. Thereupon, on the direction of Chief Secretary of M.P. Government a p
Rajesh Ranjan Yadav alias Pappu Yadav vs. CBI Through its Director reported in (2007) 1 SCC 70
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.