S.A.DHARMADHIKARI
Khel Bahadur – Appellant
Versus
Central Madhya Pradesh Gramin Bank and Others – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. Heard finally with the consent of both the parties.
2. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks direction to the respondents to keep the disciplinary proceedings in abeyance in view of the fact that on the same issue a criminal case is pending at the instance of the prosecution. Petitioner is also aggrieved vide order dated 04/01/2019 (AnnexureP-1) whereby representation dated 22/11/2018 has been rejected.
3. Petitioner while working as Officer Grade-I Branch Barier Chauraha, Morena (M.P.) in respondent No.1 Bank was issued with the charge sheet dated 16/05/2018 for various irregularities and according to which following charges have been levelled against him.
^^vkjksiksa dh fo"k; oLrq^^ (Article of Charges)
^^Jh ds-ch-,l-iUnzs vf/kdkjh laoxZ 1 kk[kk csfj;j pkSjgk eqjSuk {ks+=h; dk;kZy; Xokfy;j dks lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd mudh 'kk[kk uwjkckn esa inLFkh ds nkSjku muds }kjk fuEu xaHkhj vfu;ferrk,a ,oa dnkpkj fd;k x;k gS%&
vkjksi dz- 01
vkids }kjk 'kk[kk uwjkcnk esa inLFkh ds nkSjku eqnz.k ;kstuk ds rgr 61 _f.k;ksa ds _.k Lohd`r
Avinash Sadashiv Bhosale (Dead) Through Lrs. vs. Union of India & Ors.
Capt. M. Paul & Antony vs. Bharat Gold Mines & Anr.
Depot Manager, Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation vs. Mohd. Yousuf Miyan
Divisional Controller, Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation vs. M.G. Vittal Rao
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd & Ors. vs. Sarvesh Berry
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.