SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 320

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Shivendra Singh Parihar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri S.K. Rungta, Senior Advocate, Shri Naman Nagrath, Senior Advocate with Shri K.C. Ghildiyal, Shri Nitin Agrawal, Shri Swapnil Ganguli and Shri K.V. S. Sunil Rao, Shri Amit Seth, Shri K.S.Jha, Shri S.M. Guru, Shri Pawan Bansal, Shri Ashish Choubey, Shri Sailesh Tiwari, Shri Abhinav Shrivastava, Shri Shivam Mishra, Shri Aditya Khandekar, Shri Siddharth Sharma, Shri Gopi Chourasia, Shri Ashish Choubey, Shri Bramha Nand Pandey, Jubin Prasad, Shri B.P. Pathak, Shri Rahul Rawat and Shri Rajnish Sharma, Advocates, for the Appellants; Shri Shashank Shekhar, Advocate General with Shri Himanshu Mishra, Government Advocate, for the Respondent No.1/State; Shri Prashant Singh, Senior Advocate with Smt. Vineeta Sharma, and Shri Anshul Tiwari, Advocate, for the Respondent No.2

JUDGMENT

Vijay Kumar Shukla, J. - The common issue is raised in this bunch of petitions, therefore, they were heard analogously and are being disposed of by a common order. For the sake of convenience, the facts are noted from the W.P. No. 19393/2019 ( Shivendra Singh & Ors. Vs. The State of M.P. & Ors. ) . In these petitions a challenge is made to revised advertisement/corrigendum dated 19.08.2019 issued by the respondent no.2, M.P. Public Service Commission (for brevity, 'MPPSC'), whereby number of vacancies earlier advertised for the appointment of persons with disabilities for the post of Assistant Professor has been reduced.

2. The petitioners are persons suffering from blindness and they applied for selection to the post of Assistant Professors in respective subjects and also claimed the benefit of reservation granted to persons with disabilities under Section 33 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and full Participation) Act, 1995 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act 1995'] and Section 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act 2016 [for short, 'the Act 2016'].

3. The Parliament enacted Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunit

                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                  1
                  2
                  3
                  4
                  5
                  6
                  7
                  8
                  9
                  10
                  11
                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                  supreme today icon
                  logo-black

                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                  Please visit our Training & Support
                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                  qr

                  Scan Me!

                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                  whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                  whatsapp-icon Back to top