ORDER

Mishra J. -- 1. With the Consent of the parties, the matter is finally heard.

2. The present petition is being filed being aggrieved by the order dated 15.9.2016 passed by the respondents whereby the representation submitted by the petitioner has been rejected.

3. It is alleged by the counsel for the petitioner that the impugned order is total disregard to the order passed by the Court vide order dated 1.9.2016 passed in W.P. No. 3719/2014 (S) and the petitioner has been declared to be ineligible for recruitment in the police department. It is submitted that the inaction on part of the respondent No. 4 is not only arbitrary and malafide and appears to be an outcome of malafide but also contents in nature as he was well aware of passing of the order passed by this Court dated 1.9.2016 and despite of the fact that the Hon’ble High Court has categorically recorded the finding with respect to the fact that no offence containing in moral turpitude is made out against the petitioner has directed the authorities to reconsider the case of the petitioner for grant of appointment then also the respondent No.4 has rejected the representation of the petitioner holding that the offence und