SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 476

S.K.AWASTHI
Manoj – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
M.L. Sharma for applicant; Gaurav Verma, Public Prosecutor for respondent/State; R. S. Parmar for complainant.

ORDER

1. Applicant has preferred this revision petition under section 397 read with section 401 of 'the Code' being aggrieved by the judgment dated 20.11.2017 passed in Cri. Appeal No. 236/2015, by Additional Sessions Judge, Narsinghgarh, District-Rajgarh, whereby, Sessions Judge partly allowed the appeal by affirming the conviction against applicant - Manoj for offence under section 498A of IPC, 1860 and reduced the sentence from two years to one year R.I. by enhancing the fine amount from Rs. 500/- to Rs. 2,000/- passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Narsinghgarh, District-Rajgarh, in Criminal case No. 391/2014, vide order dated 10.7.2015.

2. Facts leading to filing of this revision application are that respondent No. 2/ complainant lodged a report at Police Station Narsinghgarh to the effect that four years back her marriage was solemnized with applicant-Manoj according to Hindu rituals and customs. After one year of their marriage the applicant and his family members were persistently making demand of cash amounting to Rs. 2.00 lakhs and a four wheeler from respondent No. 2/complainant. With intend to compel the respondent to bring the said demand, they used to harass h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top