Back
S.K.AWASTHI
Kishan – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
ORDER
1. This criminal revision has been preferred by the applicant under section 102 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 being aggrieved by the order daed 2.11.2019 passed by II Additional Judge to the Court of I ASJ, Jhabua in Special case No.6/2019 whereby the claim of the juvenility of the applicant has been disallowed.
2. Brief facts of the case are that crime No. 758/2019 for the offence under sections 305, 376(2) of IPC and section 5(L)/6 of POCSO Act has been registered against the applicant at P.S. Jhabua. After completion of the investigation charge sheet was filed against the applicant and the case was committed for trial to the Sessions Court. During the trial, an application has been moved on behalf of the applicant under section 94 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act (in short 'the Act') claiming that the applicant was juvenile at the time of incident, therefore, his case be sent to the Juvenile Justice Board for hearing.
3. The application was opposed by the respondent/State contending that there is no document available on record to establish the date of birth of the applicant and the entry made in the Aadhaar Car
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
