SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 568

G.S.AHLUWALIA
Ashok Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Jitendra Sharma for petitioner; Vijay Sundaram for respondent/State.

ORDER

1. Heard on the question of admission through video conferencing.

2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following relief(s) :

1. That, the impugned order dated contained in Annexure P/1 may kindly be quashed or the respondents may kindly be directed to conduct review DPC and grant promotion to the petitioner from a day before the promotion of the respondents No. 3 to 7 along with all consequential benefits including senior, over and above to the respondents No. 3 to 7 and ancillary benefits, in the interest of justice. 2. Any other order or directions deemed fit in the circumstances of the case be issued in favor of the petitioner.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that the respondents No.3 to 7 were junior to him, but still they have been promoted from the post of Sub-Engineer to the post of Assistant Engineer by order dated 22.1.2016.

4. Clause 4 of the writ petition reads as under :

4. Delay, if any, in filing the petition and explanation thereof That, the petitioner declares that the facts with regard to impugned action on part of the respondents promoting the juniors to the petitioner vide Annexure P/1 dated 22.1.2016 hav

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top