SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 418

G.S.AHLUWALIA
Chandra Shekhar Dubey – Appellant
Versus
Narendra – Respondent


Advocates:
Niraj Shrivastava for petitioners.

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed against the order dated 4.11.2019 passed by the Board of Revenue in Revision No. 1009-1/2008/Datia/LR, by which the revision filed by the respondent has been allowed and the matter has been remanded back after setting aside the order of partition.

2. The necessary facts for disposal of the present petition in short are that Premnarayan and one Jay Dayal were the co-owner and Bhumiswami of land bearing Survey No. 20, 74, 218/1, 423, 425/1, 435, 436, 437, 445/1, 447, 448, 449/3, 450, 884 and 889, total area 12.011 hectare situated in village Tharet, District Datia.

3. After the death of Jay Dayal, the names of his legal representatives, i.e., Narendra Kumar, Surendra Kumar and Smt. Ramshree were mutated along with Premnarayan. It is the case of the petitioner that since Jay Dayal and Premnarayan were living separately, therefore, in the year 1969-70, they mutually partitioned the land, however, no partition was done on the revenue record and since for the purpose of loan / KCC separate agricultural holding was required, therefore, Premnarayan filed an application under section 178 of MPLRC for partiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top