SANJAY YADAV, ATUL SREEDHARAN
Ravi Shankar Singh – Appellant
Versus
MPPKWCL – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Atul Sreedharan, J. - The present petition has been filed, invoking the plenary powers of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution , inter-alia praying for the quash of order granting sanction for prosecution dated 07/02/2019 (Annexure P/13) and 2910512019 (Annexure P/14).
2. The Petitioner was appointed on 09/09/2013 as an Assistant Engineer (Electrical-Contract) in the Madhya Pradesh Poorvi Kshetra Vidyut Vitaran Company Limited (MPPKWCL) (hereinafter referred to as "the Company") on contractual basis. The said order of appointment is Annexure P/1 at page 27 of the petition. The Petitioner is at S. No. 14. The said order also deputed the Petitioner along with others for institutional training from 09/09/2013 to 23/09/2013. Clause 3 of the order fixes the contract period of the Petitioner for a term of two years from 09/09/2013, subject to successful completion of one month's training. It also provided that if the appointee does not complete the training successfully, his/her contract shall be terminated immediately. Clause 4 mentions that the engagement was on a contractual basis as per terms & conditions published for the purpose, and the agreement executed betwe
Baij Nath Prasad Tripathi vs. State of Bhopal
Bharat Parikh Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Director, Central Bureau of Investigation and another vs. Ashok Kumar Aswal and another
Hardeep Singh Vs.State of Punjab and Others
Nanjappa Vs. State of Karnataka
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.