SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 644

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Nandita Dubey, J.
Meghnath Kol And Another - Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh - Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 30495 of 2020
Decided On : 07-09-2020

Advocates Appeared:
Arubendra Singh Parihar, Advocate, Sheetal Tiwari, Advocate

The court's decision to grant bail was influenced by the quantity of liquor seized from the applicants, without expressing any view on the merits of the case.

Headnote:

Bail - M.P. Excise Act - The court allowed the bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the M.P. Excise Act, considering the quantity of liquor seized from the applicants.

Fact of the Case:

The applicants filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the M.P. Excise Act, involving the seizure of illegal country made liquor from their possession.

Finding of the Court:

The court allowed the bail application, stating that it is a fit case to enlarge the applicants on bail, without expressing any view on the merits of the case.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicants should be granted bail in connection with the offence under the M.P. Excise Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the quantity of the liquor seized from the applicants and granted bail without expressing any view on the merits of the case.

Final Decision: The applicants were directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and complying with specified conditions.

JUDGMENT

Nandita Dubey, J. - This is the first bail application filed by the applicants under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail in connection with Crime No. 440/2020 registered at P.S. Nagod, District Satna for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the M.P. Excise Act.

2. As per prosecution, 60 bulk litres of illegal country made liquor alleged to have been seized from the possession of the applicants.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants have been falsely implicated in this case. The applicants are in custody since 15.08.2020 and the trial would take considerable time to conclude, therefore they be released on bail.

4. On the other hand, learned Panel Lawyer opposed the bail application and prayed for rejection of the same. However, he fairly submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the present applicants.

5. Considering the quantity of the liquor seized from the applicants, I am of the view that it is a fit case to enlarge the applicants on bail, therefore, without expressing any view on the merits of the case, this application is allowed.

6. It is directed that the applicants shall be released on bail on their each furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 35,000/- (Rupees Thirty Five Thousand only) with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for their presence before the said Court on all the dates of hearing fixed in this regard during the trial.

7. This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions :-

"1. The applicants will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him.

2. The applicants will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3. The applicants will not indulge themselves in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4. The applicants shall not commit any other offence during pendency of the trial, failing which this bail order shall stand cancelled automatically without further reference to the Bench;

5. The applicants will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial;

6. The applicants will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

7. The learned concerned Magistrate and the prosecution are directed to ensure following of Covid-19 precautionary protocol prescribed from time to time by the Supreme Court, the Central Govt. and as well as the State Govt. during release, travel and residence of the applicant during period of bail as a consequence of this order."

8. A typed copy of this order be forwarded by the Registry to the Office of the Advocate General and to Mr.Sheetal Tiwari, learned Panel Lawyer, on their respective email address, for intimation to the Police Station concerned. The office is also directed to forward a copy of this order to the learned Court below.

Certified copy/e-copy as per rules/directions.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top