Back
RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Arun Bharti – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J. - Ia No. 7082/2020, an application for urgent hearing, is taken up, considered and allowed for the reasons mentioned therein.
2. The applicant has filed this first bail application under section 438 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.
3. The applicant apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No.188/2020 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, District Datia in relation to the offences punishable under sections 3/7 of Essential Commodities Act, M.P. Motor Spirit and High Speed Diesel Licence and Control Order, 1980.
4. It is alleged by the prosecution that on 11.6.2020 complainant-Junior Supply Officer submitted a complaint that one Indian Oil dealership has been granted in favour of Sarita Bharti. As per prosecution, when on 27.4.2020 inspection was done at the petrol-pump outlet, it was found that sale of petrol and diesel was being done whereas the dealership was already cancelled. It was also found in the inspection that petrol and diesel was sold without licence and there was a difference in stock register, therefore, present case has been registered.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the case so registered is frivolous
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
