SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 821

V.P.S.CHAUHAN
Sunil Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Krishna Pratap Singh, Advocate, Anil Upadhyay, Advocate, Pooja Gupta, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Vishnu Pratap Singh Chauhan, J. - Heard on this repeat second post arrest bail application for grant of bail under Section 439 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure filed on behalf of the applicant.

2. The applicant is in jail in connection with Crime No.368/2020 registered at Police Station Maihar, District Satna (M.P.) for commission of offence punishable under Sections 417, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5/6 of the POCSO Act.

3. The first application for the same relief was dismissed on merits by order dated 31.07.2020 passed by this Court in M.Cr.C.No.22873/2020.

4. The allegation against the applicant, in short, is that the prosecutrix lodged a report against the applicant alleging therein that the applicant developed a friendship with her and on the pretext of marriage, repeatedly committed rape upon her. Thereafter, the applicant made obscene video of her and viral that video on social media when she denied to corporate with the sex. As alleged, the prosecutrix, at the time of incident, was below the age of 18 years. After investigation, charge sheet has been filed. The applicant has been arrested on 19.05.2020 since then he is in jail.

5. Learned cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top