SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 844

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Sonu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sankalp Kochar, Advocate, Anvesh Shrivastava, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Dwivedi, J. - Heard.

2. This first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant for grant of bail in connection with Crime No.480/2020 registered at Police Station-Kotwali, District Khandwa (M.P.), for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 34, 201, 212 and 120- B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(2) of the Arms Act.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as per the case of the prosecution the only allegation against the present applicant is that he supplied a knife to the main accused before 20-25 days of the date of incident. He further submits that no seizure has been made from the present applicant. He also submits that though a case of criminal conspiracy has been projected by the prosecution only on the basis of memorandum of the co-accused person namely Nigam Patel which, according to him, is not admissible. He also submits that to substantiate any criminal conspiracy as has been projected by the prosecution neither any evidence nor any material has been produced by the prosecution. He submits that the applicant is in jail since 29.07.2020, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.

4. On

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top