SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 885

SANJAY DWIVEDI
Pankaj Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.K. Tripathi, Advocate, Vivek Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Dwivedi, J. - Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the impugned order dated 24.09.2020 (Annexure P/1), petitioner has submitted his joining at the transferred place but still he wants to prosecute the matter and wants order on merit, therefore, arguments heard and matter is being decided finally.

2. The basic contention as has been raised by learned counsel for the petitioner is that an executed order cannot be modified or cancelled. He relied upon a decision passed by this Court in the case of W.P. No. 17295/2017.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner submitted his joining at the transferred place and implemented the impugned order under protest, subject to final decision of this petition because respondents/authorities were compelling him to execute the order, therefore, to avoid any disciplinary action, he has complied the order.

4. Shri Vivek Sharma, learned Dy. Advocate General for the State has also placed reliance on the stand taken by the State in their reply. He has also intimated this Court that after implementing the order of transfer and submitting joining by the petitioner at the transferred place, not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top