J.P.GUPTA
Bhola Singh – Appellant
Versus
Preetam Singh (since Dead) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
J.P.Gupta, J. - This second appeal under Section 100 of C.P.C. has been preferred against the judgment dated 31.1.2005 passed by 5th Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Chhatarpur in Civil Appeal No.70-A/2004 confirming the judgment and decree dated 22.7.2004 passed by I Civil Judge, Class II, Chattarpur in Civil Suit No. 57-A/03.
2. In this case the admitted facts are that the appellant/plaintiff and the original respondent/defendant no. 1 Preetan Singh (now he is dead) are sons of late Durag Singh and the respondents/defendant nos. 2 and 3 are sons of original respondent/defendant no. 1 Preetam Singh and the respondent/defendant Dinesh is son of the plaintiff/appellant.
3. Facts giving rise to this appeal are that the appellant/plaintiff filed a civil suit before the trial Court stating that the plaintiff/appellant and his brother, original defendant/respondent no. 1 Preetam Singh and their father Durag Singh were coparceners and have several lands and on 9.5.1978 amongst them partition had taken place in which land bearing survey no. 2461 area 2.096 hectares, survey no. 2664/3 area 1.173 hectares, survey no. 2664/4 area 1.475 hectares and survey no. 770 area 0.2
Nani Bai vs. Gita Bai Kom Rama Gunge
Roshan Singh and ors. vs. Zile Singh and ors.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.