SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 969

G. S. AHLUWALIA
Satishchandra Upadhyay – Appellant
Versus
Harnamsingh – Respondent


Advocates:
R.P. Gupta for appellants; Anand Purohit for respondent No. 2; B.K. Agrawal for respondent No. 3.

JUDGMENT

1. This miscellaneous appeal under section 173 (1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been filed against the award dated 18.10.2010 passed by Fourth Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Gwalior in Claim Case No. 107/2009, by which the claim filed by the claimants has been partially allowed. The insurance company has been exonerated from its liability on the ground of violation of the insurance policy.

2. The necessary facts for disposal of the present appeal in short are that the appellants/claimants filed an application under section 163A of MV Act on the averments that on 9.2.2009 at about 5:00 pm, the deceased Chandrakumari was coming back from Ratangarh Mata temple and was standing by the side of the road and was waiting for the bus and at that time the defendant No. 1, by driving the tractor and trolly bearing registration No. UP093/Q2021 in rash and negligent manner, turned the tractor and trolley upside down, as a result of which the deceased Chandrakumari, who was standing on the road, got crushed under the tractor and trolley and died on the spot. FIR in Cr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top