Arun Shrivastava vs State of M. P. - 2021 Supreme(MP) 123

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(MP) 123

VISHAL MISHRA
Arun Shrivastava – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Neeraj Shrivastava, Learned Counsel
For the Respondent:Deepak Khot, Learned Govt. Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Vishal Mishra, J.

1. In the wake of unprecedented and uncertain situation due to outbreak of the Novel Corona virus (COVID-19) and considering the advisories issued by the Government of India, this petition has been heard and decided through video conferencing to maintain social distancing.

2. With the consent of the parties, the matter is finally heard. The present petition is being filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seek following reliefs:-

"7.1. That, the impugned order Annexure P-1 dated 08.01.2021 passed by respondent no. 3 may kindly be set aside to the extent of petition.

7.2 That, other relief which is deem fit in the nature of case may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioner."

3. The present petition is being filed being aggrieved by the transfer and relieving-cum-attachment order dated 08.01.2021, whereby the petitioner has been shifted/transferred from the High Court Civil Dispensary to the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Hospital Superintendent, Gwalior. It is submitted that the order impugned is contrary to the directions issued in the Public Interest Litigation being W.P. No. 1416/2017 (The High Court Bar Association Vs. The State of M.P. and Othe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document