Brij Kishore Dahayat vs State of M. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(MP) 31

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Brij Kishore Dahayat – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Dharmendra Patel, Advocate
For the Respondent:R.K. Verma, Additional Advocate General, Abdul Tauwwan Faridee and Mohd. Amjad Ansari, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

Vijay Kumar Shukla, J.

Hearing convened through video conferencing mode.

1. The present intra-court appeal has been preferred under Section 2(1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyaypeeth ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, being aggrieved by the order dated 5-12-2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP-23428-2019 [Rameshwar Prasad vs. State of M.P. & ors.], whereby the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent No. 4/writ-petitioner and set aside the orders passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Pawai District, Panna and Additional Commissioner, Sagar Division, Sagar.

2. The respondent No. 4/writ-petitioner filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, assailing the order dated 24-01-2020 (Annexure-P/6) passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) and the order dated 21-10-2019 (Annexure-P/15) passed by the Additional Commissioner, Sagar Division, Sagar. The dispute between the parties is in respect of appointment to the post of Kotwar for Village, Deori Sarkar, District Panna. Initially, the Gram Sabha passed a resolution recommending the name of the respondent No. 4/writ-petitioner for appointment to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document