IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH (JABALPUR BENCH)
AKHIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Jitendra Chhitija - Appellant
Versus
State of M.P. and Ors. - Respondents
M.Cr.C. No. 48866 of 2020
Decided On : 18-02-2021
498-A IPC - Quashment of criminal complaint - Section 498-A of IPC - Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a petition seeking quashment of a criminal complaint against him under section 498-A of IPC. The complainant and the petitioner had reached a compromise and were living together happily.
Finding of the Court:
The Court considered the compromise between the parties and the satisfaction of the complainant's grievances, and quashed the proceedings initiated against the petitioner.
Issues: Quashment of criminal complaint under section 498-A of IPC, consideration of compromise in non-compoundable offences.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court relied on the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in various cases, emphasizing the importance of considering the settlement between the parties and the satisfaction of grievances in quashing criminal proceedings.
Final Decision: The impugned order was set aside, and the proceedings against the petitioner were quashed.
ORDER :
Akhil Kumar Srivastava, J.
1. The petitioner has filed this petition under section 482 of Cr.P.C., seeking quashment of criminal complaint No. 07 [CNSR No. MP21010125602019] against the petitioner pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Katni, for having committed offence under sections 498-A of IPC and further proceeding thereon.
2. According to the case of prosecution, on 28.04.2016 petitioner and respondent No. 2 got married as per Hindu rites and rituals at Narsinghpur. Out of wedlock, one daughter Ku. Mannat born. It is alleged that after marriage, serious differences arose between the petitioner and the respondent No. 2. The family members of respondent No. 2 made complaint against the petitioner and the family members of petitioner. The respondent No. 2 made a criminal complaint before the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Katni, against the petitioner, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law making allegation of demand of dowry. After hearing the arguments, the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class-Katni, registered complaint only against the petitioner/husband for the offence under Section 498-A of IPC vide order dated 23.12.2019.
3. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the compromise has taken place between the petitioner and the respondent No. 2. Both are living together along with their daughter happily. Now, there is no dispute between them. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed I.A. No. 13177/2020 an application under Section 320 of Cr.P.C., jointly by the parties supported by affidavits for compromise. With these submissions prayed to quash the impugned order dated 23.12.2019 in regard to registration of the FIR against the petitioner.
4. This Court vide order dated 22.12.2020, directed for verification of the genuineness and authenticity of the compromise between the parties. On 09.02.2021, the Registrar(J-II), recorded the statement of petitioner and the complainant/respondent No. 2, the same reads as under:-
5. Learned counsel for the complainant submitted that matter has been amicably settled between the parties and petitioner and respondent No. 2/complainant are living together happily and in terms of compromise, prayed to set aside the impugned order dated 23.12.2019.
6. Section 498-A of IPC reads as under:-
(a) any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or
(b) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand.]"
7. For ready reference Section 482 of Cr.P.C., is as follows:-
Anita Maria Dias & another Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. 2018 (3) SCC 290
B.S. Joshi Vs. State of Haryana
Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr. (2012) 10 SCC 303
Nikhil Merchant Vs. CBI & Another
The Court emphasized the significance of considering settlements and satisfaction of grievances in quashing criminal proceedings, even in non-compoundable offences.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that in matrimonial disputes, where the parties have resolved their entire dispute through compromise, the court can quash the criminal proceedi....
The court can quash criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes when the parties have resolved their entire dispute through compromise, considering the nature and gravity of the crime and its impact....
The court can quash non-compoundable offences under Section 498-A IPC if a genuine compromise exists, emphasizing the need to prevent abuse of the legal process.
The High Court has the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes where reconciliation occurs, affirming that pursuing litigation should not counterproductive to family harm....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the inherent powers of the court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. can be exercised to quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine and volunt....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.