SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 234

SHEEL NAGU, RAJEEV KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA
Ankesh Gurjar @ Ankit Gurjar – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Shailendra Singh Kushwaha and V.K.Saxena with Ayush Saxena for applicants;
Ankur Mody, Additional Advocate General for respondent/State.

ORDER

Nagu, J.-- 1. 1. This Bench has been constituted to resolve the controversy referred by Hon. the Chief Justice stemming from difference of opinions between two Single Benches of this Court.

2. Noticing the cleavage of opinions between two single benches manifested by the order dated 22.10.2020 in Misc. Criminal Case 41359-2020 [CCL (Child In Conflict with Law) v. State of M.P.] and order dated 4.11.2020 in Criminal Revision 2112 of 2020 [Ankesh Gurjar @ Ankit Gurjar v. State of M.P.] the following questions have been framed in both cases :-

Misc. Criminal Case 41359/2020

[CCL (Child In Conflict with Law) v. STATE OF M.P.]

Order dated 22.12.2020

Accordingly, the Registry is directed to forward the case to the Principal Seat and for the sake of convenience, the following proposed questions are framed :

(i) Whether the benefit of anticipatory bail u/s 438 CrPC is available for a juvenile to be availed while invoking section 12 of Juvenile Justice Act ?

(ii) Whether denial of remedy of anticipatory bail u/s 438 to a juvenile would be abhorrent to the beneficial and rehabilit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top