2019 Supreme(MP) 682

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sanjay Dwivedi, J.
Laljee Patkar v. Jainarayan Agrawal
Second Appeal No. 912 of 2019 (Jabalpur);
against the judgment and decree dated 19.2.2019 passed by
the First Additional District Judge, Chhatarpur in Civil Apeal No. 101-A/2016; Decided on 6.11.2020

Headnote:

¼1½ laifÙk varj.k vfèkfu;e] 1882 && èkkjk 58 rFkk 60 && nqdku d¢ caèkd foys[k d¢ e¨pu d¢ fy, flfoy okn && foys[k 16-6-2003 d¨ fyf[kr v©j 24-6-2003 d¨ jftLVªhÑr && çfroknh us vkifÙk dh fd og caèkd d¢ iwoZ oknxzLr nqdku dk fdjk,nkj Fkk && mldk fdjk,nkjh dk vfèkdkj vc Òh vfLrRo esa gS && mls fofèkd çfØ;k viuk, fcuk csn[ky ugÈ fd;k tk ldrk && mlus ;g iJk/kkj fy;k gS fd nLrkost dwVjfpr gSa && vihykFkÊ@çfroknh@fdjk,nkjh dk Qk;nk ugÈ ys ldrk D;¨afd caèkd foys[k ds e¨pu dk okn igys gh fMØh fd;k tknpqdk gSA 1997 ¼1½ ,e ih ,y ts 412 fufnZ"VA ¼iSjk 3 ls 7] 14 ,oa 15
¼2½ lk{; vfèkfu;e] 1872 && èkkjk 92 && laifÙk varj.k vfèkfu;e] 1882 && èkkjk 58 && jftLVªhÑr caèkd foys[k && 'ks"k vuqçek.kd lkf{k;¨a }kjk lkfcr && nLrkost d¢ çfrdwy d¨Ã vU; vfHkokd~;k e©f[kd lk{; xzká ugÈA ¼iSjk 9 ,oa 10 ¼3½ laifÙk varj.k vfèkfu;e] 1882 && èkkjk 58 && caèkd foys[k vlfy;r && foys[k 16-6-2003 dks fyf[kr rFkk 24-6-2003 dks jftLVªhÑr && vkifÙk fd caèkd dk nLrkost dwVjfpr gS && 24-6-2003 dks jftLVªhdj.k ds ckjs esa Li"Vhdj.k fn;k x;k && fupys nksuksa U;k;ky;ksa us bl rF; ij fopkj fd;k && Li"Vhdj.k Lohdkj fd;k rFkk fu"d"kZ fudkyk fd nLrkost jftLVªhÑr Fkk vkSj lE;d~:is.k lkfcr fd;k x;k && vfHkfu/kkZfjr && mDr Li"Vhdj.k esa dksbZ 'kSfFkY; vkSj foi;ZLrrk ughaA ¼iSjk 4 ls 13
¼4½ flfoy çfØ;k lafgrk] 1908 && èkkjk 100 && rF; d¢ ,d gh fu"d"kZ && fu"d"k¨Za esa d¨Ã foi;ZIrrk ugÈ && f}rh; vihy esa gLr{ksi ugÈ fd;k tk ldrkA ¼2006½ 11 ,l lh lh 587] ¼2007½ 1 ,l lh lh 546] ¼2004½ 5 ,l lh lh 140] ¼2004½ 5 ,l lh lh 762 rFkk ¼2009½ 5 ,l lh lh 264 vuqlfjrA ¼iSjk 16 ls 18
¼5½ flfoy çfØ;k lafgrk] 1908 && èkkjk 100 && 'kfä dh O;kfIr && rF; d¢ ,d gh fu"d"kZ && lk{; dk iquewZY;kadu ugÈ fd;k tk ldrk && n¨ n`f"Vdks.k laÒo && èkkjk 100 d¢ v/khu 'kfä dk ç;¨x dj ;g U;k;ky; gLr{ksi ugÈ djsxkA ¼2000½ 7 ,l lh lh 409] ¼1999½ 3 ,l lh lh 722] ¼2002½ 1 ,l lh lh 134] ¼2008½ 3 ,l lh lh 120] ¼2007½12 ,l lh lh 774] ¼2001½4 ,l lh lh 262] ¼2001½ 7 ,l lh lh 189] ¼2010½ 11 ,l lh lh 483 rFkk ¼2020½ 4 ,l lh lh 659 vuqlfjrA ¼iSjk 16 ls 18

(1) Trasnfer of Property Act, 1982 -- Ss. 58 and 60 -- civil suit for redemption of mortgage deed of shop -- deed written on 16.6.2003 and registered on 24.6.2003 -- defendant objected that he was tenant in suit shop prior to mortgage -- his right of tenant still exists -- he cannot be evicted without adopting legal procedure -- he has also taken stand that document is fabricated -- appellant/defendant cannot take any benefit of tenancy as suit of redemption of mortgage deed has alredy been decreed. 1997 (1) MPLJ 412 referred to. [Paras 3 to 7, 14 & 15

(2) Evidence Act, 1872 -- S. 92 -- Transfer of property Act, 1882

-- S.58 -- registered mortgage deed -- proved by attesting witnesses -- any other plea and oral evidence contrary to document not admissible. [Paras 9 & 10

(3) Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- S.58 -- mortgage deed -- genuineness -- deed written on 16.6.2003 and registered on 24.6.2003 -- objection that document of mortgage is febricated -- explanation about registration on 24.6.2003 given -- both Courts below considered this fact -- accepted explanation and found that document was registered and duly proved -- held -- no any infirmity and perversity in said explanation. [Paras 4 to 13

(4) Civil P.C., 1908 -- S.100 -- concurrent findings of fact -- no perversity in findings -- interferenee cannot be made in second appeal. (2006) 11 SCC 587, (2007) 1 SCC 546, (2004) 5 SCC 140, (2004) 5 SCC 762, and (2009) 5 SCC 264 followed. [Paras 16 to 18

(5) Civil P.C., 1908 -- S.100 -- scope of powers -- concurrent findings of fact -- cannot re-appreciate the evidence two views are possible -- this Court in exercise of power under section 100 would not interfere. (2000) 7 SCC 409, (1999) 3 SCC 722, (2002) 1 SCC 134, (2008) 3 SCC 120, (2007)12 SCC 774, (2001) 4 SCC 262, (2001) 7 SCC 189, (2010) 11 SCC 483 and (2020) 4 SCC 659 followed. [Para 16 to 18