G.S.AHLUWALIA
Kanta Bai – Appellant
Versus
Umashankar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This second appeal under Section 100 CPC has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 27/10/2016 passed by First Additional District Judge, Sironj, District Vidisha in Civil Appeal No. 1-A/2016, thereby affirming the judgment and decree dated 28/11/2015 passed by the Civil Judge, Class-I, Sironj, District Vidisha in Civil Suit No. 11-A/2015.
2. The necessary facts for disposal of the present appeal in short are that the plaintiff/appellant had filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction as well as for removal of illegal construction. It is the case of the appellant that she had purchased two plots from Kallu Khan and Majeed Khan by registered sale deed dated 20/6/1996. The wall of the defendants was situated on the western side of one of her plot and after demolishing the said wall, the defendants have erected a window towards the plot of the plaintiff and when the son of the plaintiff objected to it, then the defendants assured that they would remove the same, however, the same was not done and accordingly, the son of the plaintiff served a notice on defendant no.1 on 23/1/2013. In spite of notice, the defendant continued with the construction and has
Damodar Lal Vs. Sohan Devi and others
Pakeerappa Rai Vs. Seethamma Hengsu Dead by L.R.s and others
Gurdev Kaur and Others Vs. Kaki and Others
Kshitish Chandra Purkait vs. Santosh Kumar Purkait
Dnyanoba Bhaurao Shemade vs. Maroti Bhaurao Marnor
Purkait vs. Santosh Kumar Purkait
Kanai Lal Garari vs. Murari Ganguly
Panchugopal Barua vs. Umesh Chandra Goswami
Santosh Hazari vs. Purushottam Tiwari
Santosh Hazari vs. Purushottam Tiwari
Thiagarajan vs. Sri Venugopalaswamy B. Koil
Commr., HRCE vs. P. Shanmugama
State of Kerala vs. Mohd. Kunhi
Municipal Committee, Hoshiarpur Vs. Punjab SEB and Others
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. vs. Union of India
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.