SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(MP) 1160

RAJENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Amit Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Manisha Pandey – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the petitioner:Shri Sourabh Singh Thakur, Advocate
For the respondent:Ms. Amrit Kaur Ruprah, Advocate

ORDER :

1. Petitioner/non-applicant has filed this Criminal Revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. to set aside the order dated 16.5.2019, passed in M.J.C.No.186/2016, by I Addl. Principal Judge Family Court, Jabalpur, whereby learned Principal Judge, Family Court, has allowed the petition presented by respondent/ applicant under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. and directed the petitioner/ non-applicant to pay Rs.10,000/- per month as maintenance.

2. The respondent/wife filed an application before Family Court, Jabalpur, under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. It is submitted by the respondent/wife that her marriage was solemnized with the petitioner/non-applicant on 24.2.2007. At the time of marriage, petitioner/non-applicant and his parents demanded dowry. Father of respondent/wife incurred amount of Rs.12,00,000/-(Rupees Twelve Lacs) in the marriage. Thereafter, petitioner/non-applicant and his family members demanded dowry on account of non-fulfillment of dowry. On account of non-fulfillment of dowry, they tortured, humiliated and taunted her. Petitioner/non-applicant used to tell her to go to her parental house. Petitioner/non-applicant also used to tell her that one Sushila

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top