RAJENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Amit Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Manisha Pandey – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Petitioner/non-applicant has filed this Criminal Revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. to set aside the order dated 16.5.2019, passed in M.J.C.No.186/2016, by I Addl. Principal Judge Family Court, Jabalpur, whereby learned Principal Judge, Family Court, has allowed the petition presented by respondent/ applicant under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. and directed the petitioner/ non-applicant to pay Rs.10,000/- per month as maintenance.
2. The respondent/wife filed an application before Family Court, Jabalpur, under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. It is submitted by the respondent/wife that her marriage was solemnized with the petitioner/non-applicant on 24.2.2007. At the time of marriage, petitioner/non-applicant and his parents demanded dowry. Father of respondent/wife incurred amount of Rs.12,00,000/-(Rupees Twelve Lacs) in the marriage. Thereafter, petitioner/non-applicant and his family members demanded dowry on account of non-fulfillment of dowry. On account of non-fulfillment of dowry, they tortured, humiliated and taunted her. Petitioner/non-applicant used to tell her to go to her parental house. Petitioner/non-applicant also used to tell her that one Sushila
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.