Back
S.C.SHARMA
Rameshsingh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
1. The petitioner before this Court has filed this present petition for quashment of Annexure P-18 and Annexure P-20 by which his services have been put to an end as well as the order rejecting the appeal/revision.
2. The facts as stated in the writ petition reveal that the petitioner was appointed as a cook vide order dated 09.08.2002 in the pay-scale of Rs.2610-7040/-and while he was in the services of Central Reserve Police Force, a charge-sheet was issued on 10.03.2014. The petitioner did submit a reply to the charges and thereafter, a departmental enquiry was held against the petitioner. The inquiry officer held the petitioner guilty of charge No.1 and held the petitioner partially guilty in respect of charge No.2.
3. The following charges were levelled against the petitioner as per the imputation of misconduct:-
(1) that, on 14.02.2014 (after noon) without obtaining prior permission of the competent authority, the delinquent has gone out of the camp and consumed liquor. Same is a misconduct keeping in view Rule 11(1) of the Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949.
(2) that, on 14.02.2014, without obtaining permission i.e. on the same day, he had visited the house of Gopal S/o
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
