Back
S.K.AWASTHI
Vijay – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
S.K. Awasthi, J.
1. Since the present matters are connected and arise out of common judgment dated 14.03.2014 passed by 7th Additional Session Judge, Indore (M.P.) in Session Trial No. 985/2011, they are being decided by the present common judgment.
2. The appellant Vijay and Sanjay have preferred the present appeal against the aforesaid judgment passed by 7th Additional Session Judge, Indore passed in Session Trial No. 985/2011, being aggrieved with their conviction and sentence whereby the appellant Vijay has been convicted under Section 363 of I.P.C. and sentence to undergo three years R.I. with fine of Rs. 2,000/- whereas the appellant Sanjay has been convicted under Section 385 of I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo 2 years and fine of Rs. 2,000/-.
3. The appellant Ramkishore has preferred the present appeal against the aforesaid judgment whereas he has been convicted for the offence under Section 363 and 385 of I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo three years and two years R.I. and fine of Rs. 2,000/- each respectively with default stipulation.
4. Facts of the case, in short are that on 05.09.2011 at about 09:15 hours victim was returning home after dropping off her brother at G
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
A valid signature must be in the candidate's own handwriting, as emphasized by the General Clauses Act and relevant case law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
