SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 531

G.S.AHLUWALIA
Meharban Singh – Appellant
Versus
Vivek Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Vivek Kumar Vyas for appellants; Shyam Kishore Mishra for respondent No. 1; Shrinivas Gajendragadkar for respondent No. 2

ORDER

1. This miscellaneous appeal under section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been filed against the award dated 26.2.2020 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Vidisha in Claim Case No.100/2018 by which the Insurance Company has been exonerated on the ground that the vehicle in question was not having the fitness certificate.

2. The counsel for the appellants by relying upon the judgment passed by this Court in the case of United India Insurance Company Ltd. v. Vinod and others reported in 2020 (1) MPLJ 142 and in the case of Kvita Balethiya and others v. Santosh Kumar and another reported in 2020 ACJ 2077, submitted that it has been held that use of transport vehicle in a public place without permit is a fundamental/statutory infraction and fitness certificate for obtaining the permit is the minimum requirement, therefore, if the offending vehicle was not having the fitness certificate on the date of accident, then the terms and conditions of the insurance policy were violated. It is submitted that in the present case also, the Claims Tribunal should have applied the principle of pay and recover. It is further submitted by the counsel for the appellants that the Claim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top