IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sheel Nagu and Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, JJ.
Gangaram Prajapati v. State of M.P.
Writ Petition No. 16947 of 2021 (J); Decided on 14.12.2021*
Prevention of Blackmarketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 -- S.3 -- detention order -- District Magistrate obliged to report fact of passing order to State Government immediately without unnecessary delay -- District Magistrate failed to discharge obligation -- case forwarded to State Government after nearly 10/11 days of passing impugned order -- impugned order and consequential orders quashed -- petitioner be released forthwith. (2018) 9 SCC 562 followed. [Paras 5, 6, 8 and 9]
p¨j cktkjh fuokj.k v©j vko';d oLrq çnk; vfèkfu;e] 1980 & èkkjk 3 & fuj¨èk vkns'k & ftyk eftLVªsV vkns'k ikfjr djus dk rF; vuko';d foyac d¢ fcuk rqjar jkT; ljdkj d¨ lwfpr djus d¢ fy, ckè; & ftyk eftLVªsV ckè;rk dk fuoZgu djus esa vlQy & vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr djus d¢ yxÒx 10@11 fnu i'pkr~ ekeyk jkT; ljdkj d¨ vxzssf"kr fd;k x;k & vk{ksfir vkns'k rFkk ikfj.kkfed vkns'k vfÒ[kafMr & ;kph rqjar N¨M+k tk,A ¼2018½ 9 ,l lh lh 562 vuqlfjrA ¼iSjk 5] 6] 8 ,oa 9½
ORDER
Nagu, J:- 1. In the present petition, powers of judicial review under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is invoked to assail the legality, validity and proprietary of order of preventive detention passed by the District Magistrate, Bhopal on 6.7.2021 by invoking section 3 of the Prevention of Blackmarketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 (for brevity "Act of 1980").
2. Lot many grounds have been raised by learned counsel for petitioner in support of challenge to the aforesaid order but the ground which appeals to this Court is that the order of preventive detention was passed by the District Magistrate on 25.6.2021 but the matter was sent to the State Government around 5/6.7.2021 for approval.
3. Learned counsel for State submits that since the petitioner could be physically detained on 6.7.2021, the District Magistrate could only thereafter forwarded the case along with grounds of detention to the State Government for approval under section 3(3) of the Act of 1980.
4. For ready reference and convenience, section 3 of the Act of 1980 is reproduced below:-
"3. Power to make orders detaining certain persons.- (1) The Central Government or a State Government or any officer of the Central Government, not below the rank of a Joint Secretary to that Government specially empowered for the purposes of this section by that Government, or any officer of a State Government, not below the rank of a Secretary to that Government specially empowered for the purposes of this section by that Government, may, if satisfied, with respect to any person that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies of the commodities essential to the community it is necessary so to do, make an order directing that such person be detained.
Explanation.-For the purposes of this sub-section, the expression “acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of supplies of commodities essential to the community” means-
(a) committing or instigating any person to commit any offence punishable under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (10 of 1955) or under any other law for the time being in force relating to the control of the production, supply or distribution of, or trade and commerce in, any commodity essential to the community; or
(b) dealing in any commodity-
(i) which is an essential commodity as defined in the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (10 of 1955), or
(ii) with respect to which provisions have been made in any such other law as is referred to in clause (a), with a view to making gain in any manner which may directly or indirectly defeat or tend to defeat the provisions of that Act or other law aforesaid.
(2) Any of the following officers, namely:
(a) District Magistrates;
(b) Commissioners of Police, wherever they have been appointed, may also if satisfied as provided in sub-section
(1), exercise the powers conferred by the said sub-section.
(3) When any order is made under this section by an officer mentioned in sub-section (2) he shall forthwith report the fact to the State Government to which he is subordinate together with the grounds on which the order has been made and such other particulars as in his opinion have a bearing on the matter, and no such order shall remain in force for more than twelve days after the making thereof unless in the meantime it has been approved by the State Government:
Provided that where under section 8 the grounds of detention are communicated by the authority making the order after five days but not later than ten days from the date of detention, this sub-section shall apply subject to the modification that for the words “twelve days”, the words “fifteen days” shall be substituted.
(4) When any order is made or approved by the State Government under this section or when any order is made under this section by an officer of the State Government not below the rank of Secretary to that Go
The obligation of the District Magistrate to report the order of preventive detention to the State Government 'forthwith' and the impact of delayed communication on the validity of the order.
The power of preventive detention is exercised to prevent and not to punish, and strict compliance with the statutory procedure under NSA is essential.
Strict compliance with the mandatory provisions of the National Security Act is essential in cases of preventive detention.
Delays in preventive detention orders and in considering representations violate constitutional rights, rendering such orders illegal.
Delay in passing a detention order under preventive laws renders it illegal if not justified, violating the constitutional right to timely review.
The interpretation of 'forthwith' in preventive detention laws requires prompt action without undue delay, and any failure to comply with this requirement can invalidate the detention order.
Preventive detention requires timely action and sufficient grounds; delays and lack of evidence can render such orders illegal.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.