DEEPAK KUMAR AGARWAL
Sitaram – Appellant
Versus
Kanhaiyalal – Respondent
ORDER
1. Petitioner has filed this criminal revision being aggrieved by the judgment passed by the appellate Court in Criminal Appeal No.78/2008 on 26.8.2010 by which the Appellate Court has modified the judgment passed by the learned JMFC, Sironj, in Criminal Case No.580/2006 on 10.3.2008 and converted the fine into compensation under section 357(3) of Cr.P.C.
2. Brief facts of the case necessary for disposal of this revision are that respondent Kanhaiyalal and petitioner Seetaram are relatives. Respondent performs the work of goldsmith. Petitioner contacted him to purchase gold ornaments and assured that he will pay the price of aforesaid ornaments in three months. Relying upon his assurance, respondent gave him gold ornaments. The petitioner gave him cheque No.1111024 dated 6.7.2005 of Rs.2,87,500/- and cheque No.1111025 dated 21.7.2005 of Rs.2,87,500 of State Bank of India, Branch Sironj. The respondent presented the said cheque on 10.8.2005 in State Bank of India, Branch Sironj. The bank informed that as said account has been closed, it could not be encashed. Thereafter respondent gave registered notice on 27.8.2005 and demanded money within fifteen days. The petitioner on 31.8
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.