JUDGMENT

1 Regard being had to the similitude of the questions involved, on the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, the matters are analogously heard and decided by this common order.

2. The main ground of challenge to the impugned orders dated 16.8.2021, (Ann.P-13) and dated 23.11.2021, (Ann. P-17) before this Court is based on the propriety of decision making process.

3. Draped in brevity, the relevant facts for adjudication of this matter are that the petitioner- college which was enjoying the recognition was put to a show cause notice on 15.7.2021, (Ann. P-9). The petitioner, in turn filed its detailed reply, dated 19.7.2021. The respondents, by the impugned order dated 16.8.2021 cancelled the recognition for the sessions 2020-2021 for GNM Course. Aggrieved, the petitioner preferred a representation as per rule 8 of the Recognition Rules before the Council. The said representation running in five pages and preferred on 28.8.2021, (Ann. P-16) was rejected by the impugned order dated 23.11.2021, (Ann. P17).

4. Criticizing these orders, Shri Rohit Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in both the orders, the respondents have not assigned a single reason a