SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 134

S.A.DHARMADHIKARI
N. P. S. Sisodia – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Akshat Bajpai with Ms. Akanksha Sisodia for petitioner; Manhar Dixit, Panel Lawyer for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. Heard finally with the consent of both the parties.

2. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:-

i. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire relevant record from the possession of the respondents, for kind perusal;

ii. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned orders dated 31.12.2015 (Annexure-P/1) and 6.1.2016 (Annexure-P/2);

iii. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to command and direct the respondents that the impugned recovery be forthwith remitted to petitioner with interest thereon @18% p.a. till its realization;

iv. This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to command and direct the respondents for restoration of pension of petitioner by recording two advance increments as were part of the salary of the petitioner and all retiral dues can be calculated accordingly, arrears, if thereon be granted to the petitioner with interest @18% p.a.;

v. Any other relief flowing from the facts and circumstances of the case may please be awarded along with the costs of the proceedings to meet the larger interest of justi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top