SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 257

RAVI MALIMATH, VISHAL MISHRA
Abdul Mahmood Rangrez – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Aditya Khandekar for petitioner; Sandeep Shukla for respondent
No. 1; B. D. Singh, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the impugned order bearing No.08/P.B.M./R.D.M./2022 dated 5.7.2022 passed by the respondent No.3/Collector-cum-District Magistrate, District Jabalpur.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the respondents, on information that the petitioner and his son are illegally stocking essential commodities in their house, made a search on 6.6.2022. As per respondents, 116 bags of grains were stored in the house. It was intended to be transported elsewhere. Four bags were also found stored in a vehicle. The respondents visited the fair price shop belonging to the petitioner’s son on 7.6.2022 and noted the discrepancy of the stocks. Thereafter the order of preventive detention was issued under section 3(1) and (2) of the Prevention of Blackmarketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 (for short “the Act”), ordering detention for a period of six months in terms of the impugned order of detention dated 5.7.2022. Questioning the same, the instant petition is filed.

3. Shri Adi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top