SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 261

ANAND PATHAK
Sachidanand Chitala – Appellant
Versus
Registrar of Companies – Respondent


Advocates:
Sameer Kumar Shrivastava for applicant;
Praveen Kumar Newaskar, Deputy Solicitor General for respondent.

ORDER

1. Regard being had to the similitude of controversy, these petitions are heard analogously and decided by this common order. For convenience's sake, facts as narrated in MCRC No.36348/2022 are taken into consideration.

2. A tabular representation of different petitions with alleged violation by petitioner and their brief particulars is given for ready reference :--

Sr. No.

Case Number

Violation alleged by respondent

Relevant Year

Brief particular about offence

 1.

MCRC No.36752/2022

Allegation of violation section166 readwith 159 of Companies Act which is punishable under section 162 of Companies Act, 1956

2008-2009

2009-2010

Allegation is non-submission of annual return and holding of annual general meeting in the relevant year.

 2.

MCRC

Allegation of violation section129 readwith 137 of Companies Act, 2013 which is punishable under section 129 (7) and 137(3) of Companies Act, 2013

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

Allegation is non-submission of financial statement within the stipulated time with Registrar of Compan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top