SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 307

VIVEK AGARWAL
Kusum Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Harinarayan Gupta – Respondent


Advocates:
Jaideep Sirpurkar for petitioners; Ms. Sanjna Sahni for respondents No. 1 and 2; Ms. Swati Aseem George for respondent No. 3.

ORDER

1. This Miscellaneous Petition is filed being aggrieved of order dated 13.9.2019 (Annx.P/6), passed by learned II Civil Judge, Class-I, Chhindwara (M.P.), in R.C.S.No.5A/2014, allowing an application under section 154 of the Evidence Act, permitting the plaintiffs to cross-examine their own witness who has turned hostile during cross-examination.

2. It is submitted that Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sri Rabindra Kumar Dey v. State of Orissa [(1976) 4 SCC 233], in para 10 has held that:-

"a party will not normally be allowed to cross-examine its own witness and declare the same hostile, unless the court is satisfied that the statement of the witness exhibits an element of hostility or that he has resiled from a material statement which he made before an earlier authority or where the Court is satisfied that the witness is not speaking the truth and it may be necessary to cross-examine him to get out the truth."

3. It is pointed out that the ratio of the law laid down in the case of Sri Rabindra Kumar Dey (supra), is that there must be some material to show that the witness is not speaking the truth or has exhibited an element of hostility to the party for whom he is deposing. He sub

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top